Competition. It’s often hailed as the fuel for success, the driving force behind innovation, and the secret ingredient to personal and organizational growth. We’re told that competition makes us sharper, faster, better. But does it really? Or is competition more often an illusion—a game we play that leads not to greatness, but to stress, burnout, and superficial victories?
Let’s take a closer look.
Competition: A Trigger for Fight, Flight, or Freeze
At its core, competition is a survival mechanism. It taps into our most primitive instincts: fight, flight, or freeze. When we’re competing, we’re often motivated by fear—fear of failure, of falling behind, of being outdone. This might light a temporary fire under us, but it’s an unstable fuel. Fear-based motivation can push us to react quickly, but it rarely helps us respond wisely or creatively.
In a competitive environment, the goal often shifts from doing something well to simply doing it better than others. The focus narrows to rankings, comparisons, and outpacing rivals, rather than fostering genuine craftsmanship, creativity, or perseverance. When you’re locked in a race, you’re less concerned with the quality of the journey and more with crossing the finish line first—no matter how messy the process becomes.
The Illusion of Virtue in Competition
People often praise competition as if it inherently breeds excellence. But this is a misunderstanding. The qualities we associate with healthy ambition—craftsmanship, perseverance, creativity, and innovation—aren’t born from competition itself. They come from a deep commitment to mastery and value.
When someone creates something extraordinary, it’s rarely because they wanted to “beat” someone else. It’s because they cared about the work. They were motivated by curiosity, passion, or a desire to contribute something meaningful. Ironically, competition often distracts from these virtues. Instead of focusing on what we’re building or learning, we focus on who we’re beating.
This shift can be detrimental. It encourages shortcuts, superficial wins, and even unethical behavior. The ambition rooted in wanting to be the best is fundamentally different from the ambition to be your best. The former is external and comparison-driven; the latter is internal and value-driven.
The Collaborative Model: Motivation Rooted in Value
Now, imagine a different scenario: instead of competing against others, you’re collaborating with them. In a collaborative environment, the focus shifts from “winning” to creating something valuable together. Fear-based motivation is replaced by motivation rooted in trust, mutual respect, and shared purpose.
Collaboration nourishes creativity because it allows for diverse perspectives and collective problem-solving. It fosters perseverance because you’re supported by a team rather than isolated in a competition. And it enhances craftsmanship because the emphasis is on the quality of the work, not the status of the individual.
When we collaborate, we also experience a deeper sense of belonging. Humans are social creatures—we thrive when we work together toward a common goal. This kind of motivation is sustainable. It doesn’t burn out like fear-driven competition. Instead, it builds momentum, connection, and shared success.
The Hidden Costs of Competition
While competition can sometimes yield short-term gains, it often comes with hidden costs. It creates winners and losers, fostering resentment and disengagement among those who don’t come out on top. In organizations, this can lead to toxic work cultures where employees feel pitted against each other rather than supported by one another.
Even the “winners” don’t necessarily benefit in the long run. The constant pressure to maintain their position can lead to anxiety, imposter syndrome, and a perpetual fear of being dethroned. Meanwhile, the focus on beating others can stunt personal growth and prevent genuine mastery.
Reframing Ambition: From Being the Best to Doing Your Best
The antidote to unhealthy competition isn’t complacency—it’s a reframing of ambition. True ambition isn’t about outperforming others; it’s about pushing your own limits and creating something of real value. It’s about striving for excellence, not superiority.
In this framework, collaboration isn’t a sign of weakness—it’s a sign of wisdom. It recognizes that we can achieve more, and achieve it better, when we work together. It allows us to focus on growth over glory, craft over comparison, and connection over competition.
In Conclusion: Choose Collaboration
Competition is often considered a good thing, but it’s worth questioning that assumption. While it can provide short bursts of motivation, it often does more harm than good. It taps into our fear-driven instincts, distracts from true craftsmanship, and creates unnecessary division.
Collaboration, on the other hand, offers a more sustainable and fulfilling path. It nurtures creativity, fosters genuine ambition, and brings out the best in everyone involved. So, the next time you find yourself in a competitive situation, ask yourself: Is there a better way? What could you accomplish if, instead of competing, you chose to collaborate?
Chances are, the answer will surprise you—in the best possible way.
English 
Dutch